So back to the task at hand. Here at Parfum du Maxx not every perfume is going to be subject of snarky ridicule. This is one of those examples. SJP's Lovely is GREAT. Many a blogger has gone on about this being unisex and I agree to a point (PS this whole idea of gender assigning fragrance is a relatively new concept and guys at one time didn't get all upitty about smelling what we'd say in present day is "feminine" AND also, avoid saying "[you] don't like perfume" because you just have smelled bad perfume for a long time so get out of your house and experience some good smells you ingrate). Saying its unisex is limiting. Think of perfuming yourself as a surprise attack. Its the salt on your salted carmel. A tattooed hipster in a knitting circle. A stripper with a baby in a bar. Imagine Tyrese Gibson or David Beckham in a dapper suite with Chanel No5. Or a Angelina Jolie or Nicole Kidman in a gown with Serge Luten's Muscs Kubla Khan. So men, grow a beard and spray on this cuddle-bug in a bottle. Go for the pits it makes a great deoderant. It starts off somewhat shrill which was a disappointment to me after hearing so many good things about it, but quickly dries down to laundry musk, but like, HOT laundry right out of the dryer; your favorite zippy still warm. Its a shower and then a jog, a bit personal and lived in but not dirty. Straight guys, this would be a panty dropper. It all hey babe, why don't you finish this story about your cube-mate's pen stealing while I make you dinner and do dishes. People will grab you by your collar and press their face into your chest while you're at your local Sport Bar watching a your favorite team make scores and plays in a Sport Event. You know, straight stuff. 'Fumey Reader, go to your TJ Maxx or Marshals and see if you can spot a bottle. I got mine for about $30 and have stocked up a few in reserve.
Sunday, March 23, 2014
Sara Jessica Parker's Lovely
So back to the task at hand. Here at Parfum du Maxx not every perfume is going to be subject of snarky ridicule. This is one of those examples. SJP's Lovely is GREAT. Many a blogger has gone on about this being unisex and I agree to a point (PS this whole idea of gender assigning fragrance is a relatively new concept and guys at one time didn't get all upitty about smelling what we'd say in present day is "feminine" AND also, avoid saying "[you] don't like perfume" because you just have smelled bad perfume for a long time so get out of your house and experience some good smells you ingrate). Saying its unisex is limiting. Think of perfuming yourself as a surprise attack. Its the salt on your salted carmel. A tattooed hipster in a knitting circle. A stripper with a baby in a bar. Imagine Tyrese Gibson or David Beckham in a dapper suite with Chanel No5. Or a Angelina Jolie or Nicole Kidman in a gown with Serge Luten's Muscs Kubla Khan. So men, grow a beard and spray on this cuddle-bug in a bottle. Go for the pits it makes a great deoderant. It starts off somewhat shrill which was a disappointment to me after hearing so many good things about it, but quickly dries down to laundry musk, but like, HOT laundry right out of the dryer; your favorite zippy still warm. Its a shower and then a jog, a bit personal and lived in but not dirty. Straight guys, this would be a panty dropper. It all hey babe, why don't you finish this story about your cube-mate's pen stealing while I make you dinner and do dishes. People will grab you by your collar and press their face into your chest while you're at your local Sport Bar watching a your favorite team make scores and plays in a Sport Event. You know, straight stuff. 'Fumey Reader, go to your TJ Maxx or Marshals and see if you can spot a bottle. I got mine for about $30 and have stocked up a few in reserve.
Labels:
Coty,
favorites,
pretend funk,
Sara Jessica Parker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm glad you didn't resort to making fun of her resemblance to those four legged creatures.
ReplyDeleteThanks! I'm trying to keep this classy
ReplyDeleteI tested Lovely one time, and agree it was shrill. After reading this I think I will give it another try.
ReplyDelete